Thursday, February 10, 2011

Determining Specific Gravity of Minerals

I have been working on a procedure that visitors to the Louisville Science Center can use to learn about calculating specific gravity of select minerals.  If you have any corrections or suggestions for improvement, I would appreciate it.  Thanks! Below is the procedure:

There is a famous story involving the Greek mathematician/scientist Archimedes and whether a crown was solid gold. The king was trying to determine if a gold crown was pure or if the goldsmith had substituted cheaper silver in the construction of it. Archimedes has his “Eureka” moment when determining gold being denser metal displaces less water than silver thus allowing him to show the crown is not pure gold. Whether this story is true or not, it helps introduce the topic of specific gravity of objects.

The measurement of the specific gravity is useful in helping identify minerals. Specific gravity is the ratio of density of material to the density of water. An easier way to think of it might consider two equal size containers. One holds water and the other contains a mineral like galena (lead). If one weighs both, the galena would be approximately 7 times heavier than the water.

Use the table below to see some characteristics of common minerals found in Kentucky and Indiana.
Equipment Needed
  • Metric Scale to measure in grams
  • Graduated Cylinder 100 mL
  • Pencil and Paper
  • Pitcher of Water
  • Waste Water Container
  • Minerals to test

1. Weigh the mineral on the digital scale. Note the weight in grams.
2. Pour water in 100 mL graduated cylinder to a mL mark.
3. Place mineral specimen in cylinder and read the mark where the water has risen to.
4. Drain the water and mineral into the tub.
5. Subtract the water mark value with the starting water mark value.
6. Take that value and divide it in to the mineral’s weight.
7. The value is the specific gravity of the mineral.
8. Use the specific gravity and appearance to study the table to find the closest match to a mineral name.
Water is placed in graduated cylinder and measures 56.1 mL.  A specimen is placed in cylinder and water level rises to 58.5 mL.  The difference is 2.4 mL.

The specimen weighs in at 10.3 g.  So 10.3 / 2.4 = 4.29.  Since specimen is black it matches the mineral a sphalerite (3.9-4.2).

Another example

Water in graduated cylinder measured 46.5 mL and with specimen water raises to 50.5 mL.  The difference in water level is 4.0 mL.

The weight of the specimen is 17.41 g.  Using the displacement from the earlier value 17.41 / 4.0 = 4.35.  The specimen is white and fits in the 4.3-5.0 which matches barite.


Anonymous said...

Living in the central part of the state, I've come across sphalerite many times. But usually it is massive and associated with galena, barite, calcite, ect. in vein deposits. But once, I found a nice xl of it(about 1cm across) in a vug.

When I first got into geology, it was minerals that fueled my passion. Then, I rarely picked up a fossil; now, I rarely pick up a mineral.

I've though about including some of the minerals that I have found in some blog posts, but IDK???

Cheers, Tim

Kentuckiana Mike said...

For me, it is a lot easier to find nice fossils than minerals. I guess it depends on your location and what geology is available to you.

Keep posting to your blog... it makes the Internet a better place. :)

Walking Eagle said...

I presume that by now you have figured out that the sentence, "Archimedes has his “Eureka” moment when determining gold being denser metal displaces more water than silver thus allowing him to show the crown is not pure gold." should be changed to read "gold, being a denser metal, displaces LESS water than silver..."

In illustration of this point I point out that 100 g. of Gold would occupy a volume of 5.18 cc. 100 g. of Silver would occupy a volume of 9.53 cc. You can derive this from considering the reciprocals of the densities of the two metals. Thus Gold, being denser, needs to occupy less volume than Silver does, to make up the same weight.

Kentuckiana Mike said...

Thank you Walking Eagle for that correction. It has been corrected. I will be more careful in the future when writing about scientific concepts.

Unknown said...

according to specific weight specific gravity will be deferent .scale showing heaviest at lowest level lightest on upflotting. in buyance effect water gives specific buyance force to specific mineral
.this buyance deference is also specific buyance index